• ACRONYMS
  • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
  • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
  • INTRODUCTION
  • METHODOLOGY
  • SETTING THE SCENE
  • DEFINITION OF SOCIAL PROTECTION
  • Universal Social Protection
  • Residual Social Protection<brt>SOCIAL PROTECTION OBJECTIVES
  • CURRENT PROVISION LEVELS
  • DRIVERS OF SOCIAL PROTECTION PROVISION IN EUROPE
  • THE GMI WITHIN THE EUROPEAN WELFARE MODEL
  • THE HUMAN RIGHTS CONTEXT
  • THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTION POSITIONS ON SOCIAL PROTECTION
  • INSTITUTIONAL MANDATES
  • UN AGENCIES
  • THE ILO
  • UNITED NATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (UNRISD)
  • UNICEF<br<OTHER UN ACTORS
  • UN CONTESTATION
  • UN CONCLUSION
  • THE BRETTON WOODS INSTITUTIONS AND THE SOCIAL PROTECTION DISCOURSE
  • THE OSLO CONSENSUS, THE 20/20 INITIATIVE AND THE DAC TARGETS
  • THE ROLE OF THE OECD DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE(DAC)
  • THE FAILED GLOBAL SOCIAL POLICY CODE INITIATIVE
  • THE POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY PAPER (PRSP)INITIATIVE
  • DEVELOPMENTS TO THE END OF THE 20TH CENTURY
  • NEW ACTORS IN THE 21ST CENTURY
  • G8 AND G20
  • SPIAC-B
  • NON-STATE ACTORS
  • Provision
  • Policy Engagement
  • KEY DEVELOPMENTS IN THE SOCIAL PROTECTION DEBATE IN THE 21 CENTURY
  • THE MILLENNIAL IMPULSE
  • MDGs
  • PRSPs
  • DAC, POVNET Aid Effectiveness and Donor Harmonisation
  • The Rapid Social Response Fund (RSR)
  • New Institutional Strategies
  • SP AND THE POST-MDG AGENDA
  • THE HIGH LEVEL PANEL
  • HLP Goals
  • Discussion of the HLP
  • SDGS
  • DEVELOPING COUNTRY PERSPECTIVES
  • DIVERSITY OF CURRENT SOCIAL PROTECTION PROVISION AND HISTORICAL TRAJECTORIES
  • REGIONAL PATTERNS OF PROVISION
  • Latin America
  • Sub Saharan Africa
  • Europe and Central Asia
  • South and South East Asia
  • Special Cases
  • REDUCTION IN POLICY AUTONOMY
  • THE CHANGING GLOBAL CONTEXT
  • THE 2008/9 FINANCIAL CRISIS
  • CHANGES IN THE GLOBAL LABOUR MARKET
  • THE SOCIAL PROTECTION FLOOR
  • SPIAC-B AND DONOR COORDINATION
  • THE POST-2015 AGENDA
  • KEY CHALLENGES IN THE CURRENT SOCIAL PROTECTION POLICY DEBATE
  • INSTRUMENT CHOICE, DESIGN
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011799535